Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy is a book by Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Director of Scholarly Communication at the. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy by Kathleen Fitzpatrick, forthcoming from NYU Press. Kathleen Fitzpatrick. Profile: Director of Scholarly Communication Modern Language Association; Website: ; Email.
|Published (Last):||18 March 2007|
|PDF File Size:||7.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I think the argument here between ephemerality and apparent immortality of blogs is missing an important point. But the conversation that takes place here will be kathleen to my revision process. Except as permitted by law, all other uses are prohibited without written permission of the publisher.
In addition to community cooperation and gitzpatrick, Fitzpatrick shows that the incorporation of open standards and built-in extensibility are crucial to the development of successful digital text preservation practices.
They must be committed to supporting online discussions without dominating them, and they must accept that this will increase the amount of time that they must kathlesn in their writing, both because online discussions require regular participation and because their duration is indeterminate. With digital publishing, Fiztpatrick envisions a shift in the accepted conception of authorship from a solitary enterprise with a definite endpoint in the creation of the text to one of writing within a community as part of an ongoing process.
Pages to import images to Wikidata. Fitzpatrick’s study is a must-read, not just for all of those directly involved – academics, publishers, university administrators, librarians – but also for anybody interested in the future of the obso,escence.
Preservation standards metadata locators access lockss, clockss, portico cost Five: Each vendor has its own pricing and delivery policies.
Another aspect of community or collective authorship that Fitzpatrick explores is related to remix culture. Obsolescence undead mla task force overview One: Please list your name, plannd affiliation, course name and size, and institution address.
She suggests that scholars use a Creative Commons license for scholarly work to facilitate the use and reuse of obsllescence for the collective benefit of the community. One reviewer deemed her proposal “riddled with flaws”,  while another reviewer commended the public scholarship potential of such an open method. It is often assumed that issues with digital preservation are due to the ephemeral quality of obsolecence artifacts. Except as permitted by law, all other uses are prohibited without written permission of the publisher.
Listen to an interview with the author on The Critical Lede podcast here. This page was last edited on 28 Januaryat Contents Comments Activity Table of Contents. Ogsolescence Widget Planned Obsolescence: The University profit, publishing, and the university mission new institutional structures plwnned history of the university press the press and the university mission sustainability Notes notes, chapter 1 notes, chapter 2 notes, chapter 3 notes, chapter 4 notes, chapter 5 Bibliography bibliography, d-h bibliography, i-m bibliography, n-s bibliography, t-z.
Kathleen Fitzpatrick | Planned Obsolescence | MediaCommons Press
Exam Copy Please list your name, institutional affiliation, course name and size, and institution address. One of the points that this text argues hardest about is the need to reform peer review for the digital age, insisting that peer review will be a more productive, more helpful, more transparent, and more effective process if conducted in the open. At the heart of scholarly text production, preservation, and dissemination lies the university. Obsolescence undead mla task force overview One: Fitzpatrick points out that this is not entirely correct, illustrating that print text is by no means permanent and digital text is far more permanent than is commonly thought.
Fitzpatrick starts the book by deconstructing one of the most important steps in the academic publication process – peer review.
Planned Obsolescence is a wonderfully clear and honest assessment of the present state of academic publishing and fitzpatrock future directions. Critics have written positively on Fitzpatrick’s treatment of authorship. To support her argument for social solutions, Fitzpatrick examines several successful projects concerned with the development of text markup, metadata, and access standards and practices including TEIDOIand LOCKSS and shows that each is based in the creation of a community organization that values openness and extensibility.
This change is a result of the capabilities of word processing, which allows for the swift and simple revision of text, and the digital networking, which enables linking, reader commentary, and version control.
Fitzpatrrick page Planned Obsolescence. Original obzolescence edition cover. Texts documents, e-books, pages hypertext database-driven scholarship reading and the communications circuit commentpress and beyond Four: Publishing and disseminating information via the university press is one possible mode of communication.
Chapters titled ‘Peer Review,’ ‘Authorship,’ ‘Texts,’ ‘Preservation,’ and ‘The University’ methodically dismantle arguments for the status quo, with sections debating accepted beliefs and practices such as the anonymous basis of peer review; recognizable, individual fitzpatrici for-profit university presses; and the rejection of open access kathlern a tenable scholarly publishing model.
These new interactions may lead to roles for the library, the press, and IT as service units that provide guidance during and add value to the scholarly production process.
Following this restructuring, Fitzpatrick suggests that the mission of the university may be further strengthened by creating new partnerships and modes of operation between the university librarythe IT department, and the university press.
Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy.
Retrieved 19 March In addition to focusing on the development of preservation practices through community organization, Fitzpatrick argues that creators of digital artifacts must take steps to ensure fitzpatfick compatibility of their work with preservation efforts, stating: Included in these practices are three key components: In this rethinking, the press has a future as the knowledge-disseminating organ of the university.
Fitzpatrick acknowledges that online writing, and particularly the use of platforms that enable reader comments, will require authors to develop a different relationship to their work.
Kathlee Comments Activity Comments. Retrieved 2 April