Michel Foucault’s “History of Sexuality” is an undertaking in nullification of the was a regulated and polymorphous incitement to discourse (Foucault, ). Incitement to Discourse. In , Foucault asked “how is it that in a society like ours, sexuality is not simply a means of reproducing the species. In Michel Foucault’s “The Incitement to Discourse”, the development of sex as discourse within our society is illustrated beginning in the 17th.
|Published (Last):||8 January 2018|
|PDF File Size:||1.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Michel Foucault’s “The Incitement to Discourse”
Likewise, sex became a critical tool in population analytics as it was used to determine statistics like birth rate, death rate, and contraceptive use to determine the future population growth of countries.
The confession can be voluntary fouucault wrung from a person by violence or the threat of it. Ultimately, by excluding information and language that would highlight the farm hand as the perpetrator and the little girl as the victim and by deliberately outlining his takeaways from this story, Foucault demonstrates how viscourse is not an accidental occurrence, but rather, a strategic tool that is just impactful as explicit discourse.
The transformation of sex into discourse along with the dissemination and reinforcement of heterogeneous sexualities are all linked together with the help of the central element of the confession which compels individuals to express their sexual peculiarity no matter how extreme it may be Foucault, When ideas are restricted by an authority figure, it causes people to think and talk about those ideas more than before. Your email address will not be published.
Foucault on Discourses Concerning Sex
According to Foucault, until Freud, the discourse on sex that scholars and theoreticians engaged in never ceased to hide the thing that they were speaking about and by speaking about it so much, by multiplying it and partitioning it off there was created a screen-discourse, a dispersion avoidance meant to evade the unbearable and too hazardous truth of sex. That perhaps all of the forms of discourse had as their end the cultivation of a vital population, reproduction of labour capacity and the prevailing social relations.
Foucault exemplifies this with sex by describing how the Catholic church required that you confess your sexual thoughts and desires as sins. In Christian societies, sex has been the central object of examination, surveillance, avowal and transformation into discourse” Michel Foucault, Politics Philosophy Culture,  This intersection of the technology of the confession with scientific investigation and discourse has constructed the domain of sexuality within modern societies as being problematic and in need of interpretation.
Societies such as China, Japan, India, Rome and the Arabo-Muslim societies granted to themselves the ars erotica, and from this erotic art, truth is drawn from the pleasure in itself.
It stirred up peoples fear as it claimed to tell the truth as it ascribed an imaginary dynasty of evils destined to be passed on for generations Foucault, For that is the essential fact: Indeed to construct a knowledge of the individual the object of the investigation has become to uncover the truth of sex and to reveal its assumed hidden secret.
Michel Foucault’s “History of Sexuality” is an undertaking in nullification of the notion that Western society has experienced a repression of sexuality since the seventeenth century. We confess in public and in private to incitemwnt, educators, doctors, loved ones in pleasure and in pain, things that would be impossible to tell anyone else. Proudly powered by WordPress. The purpose of this paper is an attempt to explain, through the reasoning of Foucault, that modern society has implemented the mechanisms necessary for generating true discourses relating to sex.
Michel Foucault’s “The Incitement to Discourse” | ENGL – Methods of Literary and Cultural Study
The practice is understood and experienced while pleasure is not defined in relation to the permitted or the forbidden. Here, Foucault suggests a sense of innocence or normalcy for the man by choosing to explain how this act was something that was not only routine for him, but also for those around him.
By deliberately excluding specific details about the situation and by deliberately including information about the frequency and prevalence of similar situations, Foucault changes the impact and interpretation of this story.
Secondly, do the workings of power in our society belong to the category of repression and is power exercised in a general way through prohibition, censorship and denial?
Foucault informs us that historically there have been two main procedures for producing the truth of sex. He suggests that non-conjugal, non-monogamous sexualities were not prohibited or eliminated by the power of the discourse of the confessional but that they were incited and multiplied.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. This society conceived a new type of pleasure as it endeavoured to create the homogeneous truth concerning sex: It is the sanctity accorded to the heterosexual monogamy in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that has as its natural consequence the incitement to confession of a multitude of sexual perversions that were deemed as unnatural or abnormal equivalents to the ‘regular’ sexuality of the ‘acceptable’ couple Smart, The effect of these analyses was a grid of observations that related to sexual matters.
In conclusion, attempts to restrain or hide sex led to the creation of a constant air of sexuality in our actions and thoughts that we now experience today. This intersection of the discourwe of the confession with scientific investigation and discourse has constructed the domain of sexuality within modern societies as being problematic and in need of interpretation.
Use of Silence in Foucault’s “The Incitement to Discourse”
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries a diversity of discourses on sexuality in the fields of medicine, psychiatry, pedagogy, criminal justice and social work emerged. He said; “how is it that in a society like ours, sexuality is not simply a means of reproducing the species, the family and the individual? This only proliferated these sinful thoughts as people would constantly focus on not having sexual ideas that they occurred more and more.
The possibility exists that sexual discourses merely served to provide a foundation for imperatives aimed at the eradication of ‘unproductive’ forms of sexuality. And not so much in the form of a general theory of sexuality as in the form of analysis, stocktaking, classification and specification, of quantitative or causal studies” .
How has sexuality come to be considered the privileged place where our deepest “truth” is read and expressed? What knowledge savoir was formed as a result of this linkage? Here, Foucault demonstrates that the presence of silence is planned and organized in that people actively go and decide what not to say, regardless of whether the silence is driven by personal preference or societal norms or legal requirements.